Bu sayede misil veri örgülarını tekrar yeniden peyda etmek adına, var olan kodu baştan kullanabilirsiniz.

Found this thread while I was looking for a solution to the exact sıkıntı described in the original post. None of the answers met my situation entirely, however. Brody's answer was pretty close. Here is my situation and solution I found to it.

I think that, ideally, the .NET Framework would include a static sorting method that accepts an IList, but the next best thing is to create your own extension method. It's derece too hard to create a couple of methods that will allow you to sort an IList bey you would a List.

Then click on the bulb symbol or place the cursor on the IList and press Strg + "." You will become several implementations offered, like:

This will allow me to do generic processing on almost any array in the .Kupkuru framework, unless it uses IEnumerable and not IList, which happens sometimes.

Buraya uyanıklık etmenizi isterim. Liste tipine textbox dedik ve listeye textbox eklerken bile sütun nesne adını verdik. Yani text özelliğini felan vermedik. Direk nesnenin kendisini verdik. Şimdi bu fiilin berceste şu demek oluyor ki şu;

use LINQ to perform the conversion of your existing List when you return it - but it would be better to just create a more appropriate type to start with, kakım shown above.

You güç look at this argument from several angles including the C# IList Nedir one of a purely OO approach which says to izlence against an Interface derece an implementation. With this thought, using IList follows the same principal bey passing around and using Interfaces that you define from scratch. I also believe in the scalability and flexibility factors provided by an Interface in C# IList Neden Kullanmalıyız general. If a class implmenting IList needs to be extended or C# IList Nerelerde Kullanılıyor changed, the consuming code does not have to change; it knows what the IList Interface contract adheres to.

the method, it kişi make a huge difference -- if they have an array and you're asking for a list, they have to change the array to C# IList Nedir a list or v.v. whenever calling the method, a total waste of time from both a programmer and performance POV.

You would because defining an IList or C# IList Nasıl Kullanılır an ICollection would open up for other implementations of your interfaces.

This argument only works if you write your own implementation of IList from sratch (or at least without inheriting List)

List communicates "I need to get and kaş the elements of this sequence in arbitrary order and I only accept lists; I do derece accept arrays."

If you use a concrete implementation of list, another implementation of the same list will hamiş be supported by your code.

would I run into problems with this? Since could they hamiş pass in an array(that özgü a fixed size)? Would it be better maybe for a concrete List?